Saturday, August 26, 2017

The Ironic Cherry Reads... An American Sickness

An American Sickness:
How Healthcare Became Big Business
and
How You Can Take it Back
by
Elisabeth Rosenthal


It takes a lot of hands to mess up healthcare as badly as we have done in this country.  And Elisabeth Rosenthal has described pretty nearly all of those interested parties and how they have affected us and our health care in this book.  She has done it in a way that makes each aspect of the healthcare disaster personal to each of us.

Rosenthal is a writer and non-practicing physician who now writes for Kaiser Health News.  Not only is the book well-researched, but she does have her finger on the pulse of American healthcare.  In the book, she documents chapter by chapter the different pieces of the healthcare puzzle, with personal stories about wrestling with the massive and systemic incompetence and corruption.  These personal stories come from people not in the field, but also other physicians, and Rosenthal herself.  Importantly, the people whose experiences she describes are not anonymous.  They have all come forward to tell their story in order to help change this awful system.  And then she details practical ways we can effect both political change and fight personal battles over things like drugs and hospital bills.

I would like to run down all the most important details, but it seems that I would have to basically transcribe the entire book.  There is critical information on every page.  And it is information that could affect any of us.  Rosenthal has broken the book down into chapters about each aspect, from insurance, hospitals and doctors, to pharmaceuticals, medical appliances and research.

Each of those facets of health care, since the sixties, has contributed to changing the goal from improving health to increasing profit.

Blue Cross Blue Shield was once a true non-profit which goal was to make health care affordable, but when for-profit companies like Cigna stepped in, the competition forced Blue Cross to make profit a goal in order to survive.  Money was increasingly spent more on advertising and executive salaries than on health care, to the point that the Affordable Care Act now requires that the industry spend at least 80% of premiums on health care.

The initial function of hospitals was charitable.  These days many of those hospitals have become an important way to bring in money to the Catholic Church.  Again, executive pay and advertising run up the bill.  Hospitals compete by offering the services that will increase profit rather than those that are most needed.  Part of their business model is that they must continually get larger, swallowing up smaller hospitals or forcing them to close.  Hospital administrators now tend to have business backgrounds rather than medical experience.  And those administrators work hard for their big paychecks, by figuring out ways to increase profit.  Unnecessary tests and extended hospital stays, $10 aspirin, contracting out rather than having in-house doctors -- just a drop in the bucket of creative ways to jack up hospital profit, with little to no accountability.

Likewise, physicians were increasingly likely to run their practices with an eye to profit rather than the needs of their patients or community.  The doctor that stops by your bed to see how you are doing is billing you for it.  "Physician extenders" can step in and do the work of the specialist without the qualifications; double billing; coding for a more costly procedure; out-of-network physicians who are contracted by a hospital without your knowledge, leaving you with a huge out-of-pocket bill.  And you may never see the doctor who quickly scans your treatment from an office miles away, yet bills you as though he has actually provided treatment.

If you are wondering why our drugs cost so incredibly much more than those sold in any other country, the culprit is a for-profit system with a pharaceutical industry that pays lobbyists a fortune to keep government regulations at bay.  The tricks they play to keep the prices sky-high are mind boggling.  There are actual legally accepted methods that can keep a generic off the market for years after the patent should have expired.  Competitors actually make deals with companies that have big-name drugs, agreeing to keep their drug off the market for a price.

Remember Martin Shkreli, the cocky, immoral narcissist who bought the rights to a cheap generic and raised the price from $13.50 to $750 a pill?  The thing about Shkreli is not so much what he did, but that he did it so publicly and shamelessly.  In fact, that kind of abuse goes on all the time, at every available opportunity.  The government is unwilling to step in and regulate.  The drug companies make billions from our suffering.  Marketing new, expensive drugs that are less effective than older generics, extending a patent by adding a new coating to a pill, fishy FDA rules that allow drug approval with inadequate testing... again, I could go on and on.

Medical devices are another area of creative price gouging, one that is buried in other bills.  The device manufacturers' lobby has been so successful that as some members of the Senate are attempting to work together on fixing the ACA, thus far the only item that has been altered is eliminating the 2.3% medical device tax, which is actually closer to 1.5% after deductions.  20,000 jobs were not lost as a result of the tax.  The tax is not on consumer devices, like eye glasses, but only on "non-retail medical devices," like MRI's and pacemakers.  And like the $4,000 screws used in some back operations.  The prices from hospital to hospital vary like crazy; there is no rhyme or reason to the pricing.

One of my favorite boondoggle stories is a personal one.  A few years ago, while I was working at a branch of the Charleston County Public Library, each branch had installed a defibrillator.  It was a great source of wonder and comic relief for the staff.  As a library assistant, high school degree required, the assumption was that one of us would be required, with no training, to operate the defibrillator on a patron suffering a heart attack.  One of us thought that it should only be used if the patron was unconscious.  We hadn't even been given an emergency phone number.  In a very cynical way, it cracked me up.  But wasn't it a damn clever idea to sell those things to zillions of local governments across the country? With little proof of effectiveness of defibs in public places, no funds for training, and a pretty good-sized price tag for governments that, in the 2000's were bearing the weight of huge budget cuts.  Hate the government?  Blame the corporations that prey on them.

Medical tests are overpriced and overused; in-house testing creates greater profit for doctors and hospitals and sometimes ridiculously higher bills for patients.  Ambulances are now in many areas contracted out, and the costs non-negotiable, and often, not covered by insurance.  Physical therapy used to be an affordable service but is now big business.

Medical coding, rather than being a language that makes it easier for professionals to know a patient's medical status, is now an opportunity for obfuscation and profit.  Consultants are hired to find a way to pad the bill by entering a more highly reimbursed procedure code.

And then there is research.  Research is the excuse given by pharmaceuticals and device manufacturers for their exorbitant prices and insistence on longer patent times.  But "new" items too often these days merely replicate old, tried and true -- and less expensive --  drugs or devices, research is oftentimes not as rigorous as seems to be required.  And results and follow-ups, well, they just aren't cost effective when it comes to the bottom line, so when the regulators aren't paying attention, they too often are minimized or don't happen.

Medicare and the Affordable Care Act have both attempted to improve medical outcomes and curb costs, but those who stand to profit work tirelessly to get around those efforts to provide affordable quality care.  And lobbyists ensure that our lawmakers don't do much to get in the way of the industry.  Al Franken, Amy Klobuchar and -- my god -- Elizabeth Warren, all worked across the aisle to support REPEAL of the medical device tax, which had been intended to finance Obamacare.  Why?  Because Minnesota and Massachusetts are home base for three of the largest device manufacturers.

On that sobering note, the author goes on to itemize by category our $3 trillion health care bill.  And then, in a short but important section, she gives practical instructions for combating the health care behemoth in our own lives, as, for example, when you get an unexplained charge on a hospital bill.

It would be in your own interest to read this book.  But we don't all have the time.  But I urge you to check it out of the library, glimpse through it, and pick a chapter that calls out to you.  Fifteen minutes of your time (if you can put the book down) will give you an idea of why it has taken so long to get to Obamacare and why there has been so much energy, and so many dollars, put into dismantling it.  And why it is so important to take down this massive waste of money and lives.

Thursday, August 17, 2017

When the Lesser of Two Evils Is Equally Evil

One of the games we have been playing since November 9 is:  which is worse, Trump or Pence?  This is a game that is not only engaging, but terrifying.  In it we have to decide which of two evil leaders we would choose to be in charge of destroying our country.

You have probably heard the pros and cons.  Trump is crazy and could do irreparable harm, as in nuclear war.  Pence is pure evil and will do irreparable harm, but probably won't engage us in nuclear war.  We may be able to repair the harm Pence does to our civil liberties... or maybe not.

There is a strange show on Comedy Central that I just discovered called The President Show.  The guy who plays Trump is just eerie, because he smiles.  Trump does not smile.  When he attempts to smile it is a grimace, a slash, as opposed to the sides of his mouth actually turning up.


Note that the eyes also grimace.

But the Mike Pence character, played by the funny and talented Peter Grosz, really nails it.  In a sketch with three actual world-renowned ethicists, Pence "explores" what "ethics" actually is.



This is a brilliant sketch that ends with the Rev. Paul Raushenbush saying that he is most worried that Pence would be "better at being president than Donald Trump but with the exact same goals."

The three ethicists and Grosz play their parts in such a way that it sent chills through me.

It turns out, however, that the Trump/Pence philosophical debate has merely been the warm-up for the ethical dilemma that is the Age of Trump.

When Trump began to gripe about "Attorney General" Jefferson Sessions and his failure to support Trump in the Russia investigation by stunningly doing the right thing and recusing himself, a whole new can of worms turned up in the White House cafeteria.  The bitching was so sharp-tongued that it seemed to leave no other option but for Sessions to resign.  The reason resignation was so important is that, according to one interpretation of the law, only if he resigned could the president appoint a replacement.

Of course, we know Trump was pissed off because he has assumed a Sessions A.G. would refuse to prosecute Trump crimes in colluding with Russia to influence the election.  And public pressure has been such that even the House of Representatives' convoluted attempts to block the investigation have thus far failed.

Coming up on summer recess, with increasing attacks by Trump on Sessions, it seemed that Sessions just couldn't stay.  And if he left while Congress was not in session, Trump could assign a recess appointment, and it would be someone who would be more compliant, someone who would be more than willing to fire Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller at the president's behest.

The quandary with which we philosophers of democracy were suddenly faced was yet another reverse Sophie's choice.  Would it be better to have the evil Jefferson Sessions quit and be replaced by someone who would no doubt derail the Russia investigation and leave Trump safely in the White House?  Or would it be better to leave Sessions in his powerful position at DOJ so that Mueller's investigation can safely proceed?

Turns out that a tantrumming Trump is no match for Jefferson Beauregard Sessions.  He has been waiting for the opportunity to wield this much power all his life.  And while we are all distracted by the other horrors of this administration, as well as the cascade of purely stupid presidential tweets, Sessions has indeed gone about his business of destroying our rights and freedoms, with relish.

Sessions learned a lot growing up alongside the KKK.  Whereas they wore sheets and committed their hateful acts in the dark, Sessions moves quietly in daylight.  He denies his bigotry while devising his schemes to harm people of color.  In his relatively short time at the DOJ, Sessions has worked feverishly -- but again, quietly -- to knock down hard-won pillars of freedom.  It turns out that, like Forrest Gump, Sessions has found his way into the most important halls of history, where he can do his dirty deeds with impunity.

Since he received his loyalty award from Trump, he has begun to go after states that have legalized marijuana.  This defender of states' rights -- "except when he doesn't"  -- is going after sanctuary cities which seek to protect undocumented immigrants who live and work peaceably in their communities.  He is attempting to overturn protections against civil asset forfeiture, the seizure of property prior to criminal conviction.  He is now placing the federal government front and center in the war against affirmative action.  Of course, he has a different take on states' rights where minority rights are being attacked:  he decries federal involvement in cases of possible police abuse, voting rights, and LGBT rights.  And he is demanding data on visitors to an anti-Trump website, an attack on our right to privacy that we must not ignore.

This insult to the Keebler elf never sleeps.

But would we rather have him leave and pave the way for Trump to derail the investigation that could prove the way to his impeachment?

So many of us have given over sleepless nights to the bad choices we have.  I have decided that we have to trust the rules of law, and our ethical and moral compass.

In the case of Trump/Pence, it can't be a matter of who will do the more harm.  If we allow Trump to continue to control the government because we fear Pence, we are rejecting the protections that were built into our democracy.  We need to rid ourselves of the rot that is currently corrupting the presidency.  And then we need to battle the evils that Pence will attempt to enact.

More difficult is the question of Sessions, because he has no plans to leave, and he is fortunate enough to be able to go about his dirty deeds while Trump is tossing his feces around Washington and the nation.  At this point we can philosophize and debate, but there isn't much we -- meaning moral Americans -- can do.

But as with Trump/Pence, we can't excuse evil because it may be the lesser evil.  Sessions is daily corroding the rights and freedoms of Americans, happily going after minority rights, but also his pet right-wing peeves, and possibly most serious, our right to privacy.  I have to believe that Trump's crimes are so bad that there is no way out for him, whether he is able to figure out a way to rid himself of Mueller or not.  Meanwhile, we must be aware of the evil that is being enacted by the "Department of Justice," and we must, we must, speak out.

And lest we forget whose side the majority in Congress is on:

It was encouraging that before the recess, republicans worked on a bill that would prevent Trump from making a recess appointment that would potentially replace the AG with someone who would fire Special Prosecutor Mueller.  But their concern masked their loyalty to their former colleague.  The abhorrent acts that Jefferson Sessions is undertaking fall right in line with the goals of the republican Congress.  Restrictions to civil rights, enhanced police powers, curtailing privacy and freedom, they all come under the goals of the right wing.  They are delighted that Sessions is in the DOJ fighting for them.  So the bills put forward to prevent a potential recess appointment was more about loyalty to their own than protecting the Russia investigation.  And the fact that they seemed to be finally willing to fight to find out the truth about the election was just pure gravy.  

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

A Few Words about the Price of Gas

I flipped when CNN ran a banner a few weeks ago saying that the price of gas was the lowest it has been in years.  I KNEW that was not true, because, being on a limited income and living out in the boonies, a few cents a gallon up or down adds up.  Politicians, and organizations that represent the oil and gas industry, have been playing fast and loose with the price of gas since forever, but I have been fascinated with the way they are working the public since the price finally began to come down a few years ago.

But going back into the painfully high gas prices of the Bush era (here in SC I remember paying nearly $4/gallon before the price began its drop), the right-wingnut cry was for -- you guessed it -- more freedom for the gas and oil industry:  Drill, Baby, Drill.  If that had been the most stupid thing Sarah Palin said during the 2008 campaign, I believe history might have been really different, because promising to lower the price of gas by drilling appealed to an awful lot of Americans.

And sadly, from fracking and resultant earthquakes, to pipelines and the leaks and spills caused by poor design and maintenance, to coal mining and its risk to workers due to its inherent danger and abhorrent safety practices, it has been nearly impossible to counter the demand for more and yet more oil.  The siren song of more jobs has been magnified by Trump's narcissistic rendition of reality.  He promised 28,000 jobs as he signed the executive order allowing the building of the Keystone pipeline.  It is actually two to four thousand temporary jobs while it is being built and 35 permanent jobs when finished.  The truth comes too late; the industry pockets its profits and we are forced to deal with the environmental and human disasters.  And the price of gas doesn't go down.

Newt Gingrich bloviated about the price of gas when he ran his pathetic presidential campaign in 2012, claiming that Obama intended to get the price of gas up to $8 to $9 a gallon, and he alone could get it down to $2.50.  And yet, when the price of gas went down as low as $1.50 last year, someone in the crowd at a Hillary rally had to shout out at the President about the low price of gas, because nobody was talking about it.  Of course, Dems, unlike republicans, are reluctant to take credit for something they haven't had anything to do with.  But Obama's stealth energy policy (again, nobody bragging about accomplishments) had managed to make gas cheaper without trashing the environment.  And unemployment declined without all those dirty energy jobs being added; in fact, renewable energy has created hundreds of thousands of jobs in the US.

So what has been happening to the price of gas, really?  A three-year chart shows the plummeting of gas prices in 2014 and 2015, only beginning a steady rise in February of 2016, as tension mounted around the presidential campaign.

After the election which promised to shitcan environmental regulations and give a go-ahead to fuel industry rape and plunder, it seems the Wall Street speculators are ready to party.  And just as they did during the Bush years, the media is reporting the gains as though there will be no dark side, ever.  But as the price of oil goes up, the price of gas at the pumps goes up.

But here is the thing that really drives me nuts.  The price doesn't just go up and up and up.  There is a method to the madness of the oil industry.

When I check the price of gas as I leave my Wadmalaw Island home and venture out to Johns Island and civilization, I see that it has gone up TEN CENTS a gallon since the last time I passed, a couple days earlier.  The very next day it goes down four or five cents.  Well, that feels like a relief, doesn't it?  And then it goes up a couple more cents, maybe down a penny.  This goes on for a month or two, and then steadies.  Until it goes up another ten cents, and the shock is followed by relief which eventually leads to being acclimatized to the big hike and ready for the next wave.

In November, the price of gas by me was $1.59 a gallon.  Today it is $2.19.  Last week it was $2.09.

At some point, when people start complaining, the oil industry will produce some rationale for the hike.  Nobody will be there to debate whatever reason they give.  We will have pipelines producing a handful of jobs and drilling destroying our earth, and we will be tightening our belts to buy gas, just like we did in the good old days of the Bush administration.


By the way, here in South Carolina we have been waging the battle of the gas tax for years, until our roads and bridges got so damned bad they finally passed the hike.  I am sure that many of our less informed citizens will be quick to point out that the rise in the price of gas is due to the tax hike them damn liberals voted in.  Actually, the price of the gas tax in South Carolina did go up in June, by two cents a gallon.  So please feel free to poke a hole in that one when it floats by. 

Thursday, August 3, 2017

With Friends Like These...

It has been tough enough fighting the forces of evil lately.  But just in the past couple of days we have been hit upside the head by our own Democratic Party.  Multiple times.  Let me just regale you with three items in the news.  Hang on to your hats, friends.

Shock #1


My hero, John Lewis, just last year led a sit-in in the House of Representatives, to protest the refusal of republican leadership to allow a vote on gun control legislation.




You may recall that, during the Memorial after the horrific shooting in Charleston, a call for gun control received a standing ovation -- except for Tim Scott and Nikki Haley, notably sitting front and center.  Scott receives the complete support of the NRA, with an "A" rating.

I haven't lived in South Carolina long (in southern time:  only 18 years).  But Tim Scott and I go back to when I was working at my beloved Charleston County Public Library and he was on County Council.  In the economic destruction of the Bush years, here in Charleston, Tim Scott voted to drastically cut funding for our award-winning library.  The library that teachers in a perennially exhausted school system used to provide the best books to their students, the library that provided an amazing collection to those of us who would never have had that kind of access to literature and science -- Tim Scott voted to slash the budget.

And last week, Tim Scott sat smiling broadly next to Donald Trump as he bloviated about how he was going to get the Senate to pass the health care bill.  And then Scott voted to do Trump's bidding and take health care away from millions of Americans.

That Tim Scott, that is the person who John Lewis has just awarded the John Lewis--Amo Houghton Leadership Award for Faith and Leadership.  Okay, I understand that this is an award given by a group that is committed to non-partisanship.  And I know it is hard these days to find a republican that hasn't compromised himself to hell to follow the leaders of his party.  But Tim Scott???  Yes, he will go on about his faith at the drop of a hat.  But there isn't a damn way you can call him a leader.


Shock #2

And then yesterday I learned that the DCCC had formalized its desperate need to seek the support of the Trump voter by stating that they would support candidates who were anti-abortion.

I imagine that wimpy Tom Perez is hiding behind Bernie Sanders on that one.  Bernie, you may recall, failed us big time when he threw his support behind anti-abortion mayoral candidate Heath Mello in April.  Let me clarify my take on this.  Bernie Sanders had the clout to offer to support Mello if he changed his position on reproductive rights.  Mello didn't have to say he "believed" in abortion; it would have been enough to say that he supported a woman's right to make her own choice.  But he did not.  Despite appeals from women and women's groups, Bernie stood firm in throwing women under the bus to support an otherwise progressive candidate.

So, with Bernie's transgression as inspiration, the Democrats went on a highly suspect Democratic "listening tour." Suspect because it doesn't appear the Democrats are listening to anybody but their own fearful conservative leaders.  Hillary may have won the popular vote by three million, obscenely gerrymandered voting districts and horrendous voter suppression laws may have resulted in Dems winning the vote and losing Congress, but to our Democratic leaders, what we need to do is compromise our values in order to win.  The Democratic Party is like an abused spouse, promising ever more vehemently to behave each time they are struck.

Compare and contrast this to the republican party, which has maintained their leadership by promising to derail the programs that best serve their constituents.  The difference?  They really, really believe in what they stand for.  Tom Perez and the DCCC, not so much.  It has been nice to see the recent squabbles among republicans when faced with the psychotic behavior of the head of their party, but don't forget, only three republicans voted against the despicable Senate health care bill.

And with Democrats supporting anti-choice candidates, who will they compromise next?  Look around folks, because all of us have our vulnerabilities.  LGBTQ, affirmative action, gun control, unions....  basically, all the groups that the Democratic Party is supposed to protect and represent.  The sad thing about this, other than leaving us all hanging out to dry, is that it won't work.  Bigotry-lite will never have the appeal of outright right-wing bigotry.  And the thing about the Democratic Party is that they are just aware enough of what they are doing to be embarrassed by it.  They will never stand strong no matter what they say they stand for, and then they will still be attacked for being Harvard/Goldman Sachs elites.  And when that happens, they will blush and deny it.

With the "listening tour" party sorely in need of a hearing aid, I have taken to firing back at fund-raising emails, saying that there is no way on this still-green earth that I will throw money down that toilet.  I do try to say it in a more civilized manner.  The other thing I do, and I encourage y'all to do both, is tweet @WhicheverDemIsBeingAWuss to let them know you won't support them unless they shape up.  And then send your money and your support to all those great candidates who stand up for all of us.  The DCCC may have forgotten what the Women's March and Indivisible are all about, but we remember, and we will continue to stand together.


Shock #3

And speaking of standing together, I glanced at Twitter today and saw one from Bakari Sellers that wasn't really shocking as much as saddening.  So I replied.



Here in Bakari's state of South Carolina, the Democratic Party just passed over a highly qualified, politically active and successful woman (white) to go out of state to choose a white man to lead the party, which was at the time being led by a black man.

But you don't have to be a white woman to be passed over by Democrats.  In 2014, Joyce Dickerson ran in a primary for US Senator against newly appointed Tim Scott.  She was told by our own Jim Clyburn that she should step aside and let the two men fight out the primary.  Well, with her powerful voice and message, she won the primary, but you wouldn't know it by the help and support she got from her party.

And just this year our state party put their thumb on the scale of the special election for US House seat for District 5.  They unabashedly backed a rich white guy over a young black woman.  And they had help from a bunch of big-name out-of-state Democrats.  Wasn't a day I could check my email or visit Facebook without seeing that white guy's face or a fund-raising email from Robby Mook or Daniel Barash -- again, before the primary.  And yet, that woman who ran without national or state support had a strong message and strong community support; in a three-way race, she got some 22 percent of the vote.

So let's not inject a white woman bias into this debate, okay? 

Here is the thing.  The republicans have been able to pit us against each other for decades.  We have all been victimized by an unfettered capitalist system run by rich white men.  Republicans in the positions of greatest power don't really give a damn about abortion or even the threat of terrorism -- you only have to look at how blase they have been at Trump regime's national security transgressions to know saving the nation is not what they are all about.  What they care about is power, maintaining and growing that power.  And they do that by making people scared and angry -- at each other.

And boy-o, Dems are an easy target.  We are still fighting over Bernie versus Hillary.  And when we argue over who has been the most victimized, they score an easy win.

So, let me say again, let's not do that.  And let's tell the Democratic Party that they had better stick by ALL of us.  And let's keep supporting our great progressive candidates.  We have proven that we don't need the Democratic Party if we have the community.  And with our social network, our community is the entire country.  And these days, much of the world is behind us.

Women marched together, not for one cause or another, but for all of us who are suffering from the callousness and greed of the wealthy and powerful.  And men marched too.  You could march with us even if you were anti-abortion -- you just couldn't march for that with us, because that would have gone against the whole reason for the march.  This is about all the individual rights and freedoms that are being systematically taken away.  Jefferson Sessions might don his white hood and come after Muslims today, but tomorrow he will find time to go after sick people who use marijuana to ease the pain, and the day after that he will get to interment camps for Mexicans, and then young women using birth control, and yes, Bakari, affirmative action.

The Democratic Party needs to be reminded what they say they stand for:  individual rights and freedom for all.  We don't need a party to get behind a great candidate, but we can get their attention and refocus them on who they claim to be.