The Heritage Foundation has pretty much always been more about greed than about smarts. But yesterday, Jim DeMint announced his plans to dumb down the organization just that much more.
If you've been out of town, or perhaps on a space shuttle back from Mars, you may have missed Jim DeMint's resignation, effective January, from the Senate. He tells us that his decision to accept the position of president of the Heritage Foundation is because the conservative movement "needs strong ideas." This is like Big Bird trying to convince ETV that he is leaving to teach omelette making.
I see three reasons for Mr. DeMint's jumping ship.
First of all, he may not be smart, but he is shrewd. I imagine he started to squirm as the national election results began to come in. It appears he has decided to leave his Tea Party compatriots blowin' in the wind of the electorate's move to more progressive, less corporate, ideals.
Secondly, DeMint is hardly very smart, but he is greedy. This move will bring him in many more dollars with which he can continue to fight taxation for the common good.
Finally, DeMint is most decidedly not smart, but he knows what he likes. He does not like talking to people who will ask him annoying questions, or expect him to be accountable for his decisions. His last election campaign, Running for Re-Election for Dummies, was aided by anonymous donors who vaulted the mysterious and comedic Alvin Greene into the Democratic nominee position, right over a candidate with brains.
Jim DeMint is right up there with Clarence Thomas when it comes to sulking and refusing to talk. Both believe that their positions of power should not involve having to rub elbows with the peasants they rule. Beyond that, they hate, hate, HATE being argued with, much less mocked. It is my belief that DeMint still has nightmares over being the national laughingstock over his comments about single pregnant women not being allowed to teach.
Never again. Just as Clarence Thomas will never be required to utter a word to anyone he deems beneath him, Jim DeMint will now be amongst like fellows.
So, I would like to join the Washington Post in saying that I'm tickled that you have decided to leave this august institution, making it just a bit more august than it was while you were there. As South Carolina's own Representative Jim Clyburn pointed out, you didn't get along all that well with the other members of Congress, even those on your own side of the aisle.
I wonder how long before Heritage Foundation starts to realize just what they got themselves into....
Showing posts with label Heritage Foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heritage Foundation. Show all posts
Friday, December 7, 2012
Friday, November 11, 2011
DeMint in a Vacuum
Proud to be from Jim DeMint country again today. It was that strange Alice in Wonderland kind of experience that happens so often whenever someone from the republic party opens his mouth.
Checked my email, to find a message from Senator DeMint, dated today, Veterans Day. In it, he goes on about how grateful we should all be to our troops who are risking their lives for us. Blah, blah, blah. Contemplated sending a reality based reply, then remembered that that would be like a thought being swallowed by a black hole, and hit delete.
A short while later, I was catching up on yesterday's news, and, quelle suprise, DeMint's name came up.
Seems that yesterday, the day before Veterans Day, Senator DeMint was the only no-vote on a bill to provide tax credits to employers who hire veterans.
Jim thinks this is a "democrat" plot to make him look bad. And besides, it would be unfair to give an advantage to a guy who just returned from getting shot at defending our country.
Good to know that Jim DeMint has a sense of fair play, even though his command of the English language is questionable.
Actually, forgive my cynicism, but despite the fairy tale spun by the Heritage Foundation, many of the returning veterans are likely to be working class or poor, and many are persons of color. If those coming back were well-connected, not only would they not be needing the government's help in getting a fair shake, but DeMint would be all over it, wanting to make sure we gave our veterans what they "deserve".
I don't believe that Jim DeMint is a racist. I believe he is a class warrior. He will fight and fight tirelessly for those who have, because in his mind, they (himself included) deserve what they have.
So, on the one hand, veterans, Jim DeMint thanks you for your service. On the other hand, now that you're back, you're on your own.
Checked my email, to find a message from Senator DeMint, dated today, Veterans Day. In it, he goes on about how grateful we should all be to our troops who are risking their lives for us. Blah, blah, blah. Contemplated sending a reality based reply, then remembered that that would be like a thought being swallowed by a black hole, and hit delete.
A short while later, I was catching up on yesterday's news, and, quelle suprise, DeMint's name came up.
Seems that yesterday, the day before Veterans Day, Senator DeMint was the only no-vote on a bill to provide tax credits to employers who hire veterans.
Jim thinks this is a "democrat" plot to make him look bad. And besides, it would be unfair to give an advantage to a guy who just returned from getting shot at defending our country.
Good to know that Jim DeMint has a sense of fair play, even though his command of the English language is questionable.
Actually, forgive my cynicism, but despite the fairy tale spun by the Heritage Foundation, many of the returning veterans are likely to be working class or poor, and many are persons of color. If those coming back were well-connected, not only would they not be needing the government's help in getting a fair shake, but DeMint would be all over it, wanting to make sure we gave our veterans what they "deserve".
I don't believe that Jim DeMint is a racist. I believe he is a class warrior. He will fight and fight tirelessly for those who have, because in his mind, they (himself included) deserve what they have.
So, on the one hand, veterans, Jim DeMint thanks you for your service. On the other hand, now that you're back, you're on your own.
Saturday, September 10, 2011
Where Are the Poor?
You have to admit, we Americans hide our poor well. That, plus the fact that when you're tired, cold and hungry you just don't make it a priority to write to your congressional representative, much less get out and vote, making the ever-increasing number of poor in this country quite unheard from, and even less talked about.
The right-wing-nut Heritage Foundation, stranger to empathy that it is, published on July 19th, an article that smugly asserts that the poor in this country are far better off than most third world countries. Thankfully, when FOX "News" leaped on this report, Colbert was not far behind.
In fact, if you search the web for "poor America refrigerator" you will find an abundance of appalled responses to the Heritage nonsense. In July and August. Here we are in September and I am afraid that all we are left with is Tea Partiers and other assorted right-wing-nuts that now know for a fact that poor people in America are living high.
And, if you look closely at that search -- wait! Robert Rector, the Heritage Foundation dude that wrote that article, actually rewrote it from an article he wrote in 2007. He did make some crucial changes, though.
In 2007, in his chart showing just how much stuff the poor really own, he listed homes first (42.6%). In a clever marketing-type strategy, in his reworked 2011 chart, he drops home ownership entirely; hmm, could that be because a whole lot more "poor" don't own homes anymore. No, that's not it, because he's using the exact same data from 2005. Must be because that figure of 99.9% that own a refrigerator is far more impressive. Like, all poor people own refrigerators!
As a matter of fact, 99.9 is such an impressive number, that he changed it from the 2007 article, using the same data, from 99.2. Not to be picky. Because Rector is so good at slinging charts and poll numbers around that the whole thing gave me a headache.
Bottom line, though, is that the Heritage Foundation is claiming that most Americans should not be considered poor if they own a refrigerator. And they have been at it for years.
Deja vu all over again, if you are old enough to recall Ronald Reagan's presidency-winning nonsense about the black welfare queen.
Or if Rector reheats this data and serves it up again in a couple more years.
The right-wing-nut Heritage Foundation, stranger to empathy that it is, published on July 19th, an article that smugly asserts that the poor in this country are far better off than most third world countries. Thankfully, when FOX "News" leaped on this report, Colbert was not far behind.
In fact, if you search the web for "poor America refrigerator" you will find an abundance of appalled responses to the Heritage nonsense. In July and August. Here we are in September and I am afraid that all we are left with is Tea Partiers and other assorted right-wing-nuts that now know for a fact that poor people in America are living high.
And, if you look closely at that search -- wait! Robert Rector, the Heritage Foundation dude that wrote that article, actually rewrote it from an article he wrote in 2007. He did make some crucial changes, though.
In 2007, in his chart showing just how much stuff the poor really own, he listed homes first (42.6%). In a clever marketing-type strategy, in his reworked 2011 chart, he drops home ownership entirely; hmm, could that be because a whole lot more "poor" don't own homes anymore. No, that's not it, because he's using the exact same data from 2005. Must be because that figure of 99.9% that own a refrigerator is far more impressive. Like, all poor people own refrigerators!
As a matter of fact, 99.9 is such an impressive number, that he changed it from the 2007 article, using the same data, from 99.2. Not to be picky. Because Rector is so good at slinging charts and poll numbers around that the whole thing gave me a headache.
Bottom line, though, is that the Heritage Foundation is claiming that most Americans should not be considered poor if they own a refrigerator. And they have been at it for years.
Deja vu all over again, if you are old enough to recall Ronald Reagan's presidency-winning nonsense about the black welfare queen.
Or if Rector reheats this data and serves it up again in a couple more years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)